Statit piMD™
Statit piMD Demo
Benefits Overview
Take a Tour of Statit piMD
FAQs
Statit piMD Brochure (PDF)
White Paper: Living Quality Improvement Every Day (PDF)
Continuous Quality Improvement Overview (PDF)
CQI Chart Guide
Quality Practice Tips
Justifying Statit piMD Purchase
Performance Improvement Webinars - ON DEMAND!

View Statit piMD Videos:

Statit piMD in 10 minutes!

Statit piMD's "My Indicators"

Current version: Statit piMD 3.6

Delighted Statit piMD Customers Include:

  • Alaska Native Medical Center
  • Alberta Health Services
  • Bellin Health
  • Bluegrass Regional Mental Health
  • Burke Rehabilitation Hospital
  • CareOregon
  • Fletcher Allen Health Care
  • GLW Army Community Hosp.
  • MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • North Kansas City Hospital
  • Ohio Health
  • Oregon Health & Science University
  • PeaceHealth
  • St. Boniface General Hospital
  • ThedaCare
  • Thomason Hospital
  • Washington State Hospital Association

Subscribe to Statit Bulletin, our quarterly CQI/Quality Resource e-newsletter

Your Name:
E-mail:
Organization:
 

Statit Webinar—Successful Performance Improvement Initiatives: The Role of the Process Expert


In this complimentary webinar, you will learn why and how your process expert plays a critical role in driving strategic improvements throughout the organization.

  • What is a "Process Expert"?
  • What are their key responsibilities?
    Practicing Continuous Process Improvement:
    • Providing ongoing Assessment and Action Plans for the processes they are responsible for
    • Identifying changes to the process and communicating if the changes had a real impact on the outcome
    • Validating the data of key processes that they are responsible for
  • What tools are needed to help the process expert with their responsibilities?
  • How is the information disseminated in "real time"?

The webinar will help you understand how the Statit Performance Indicator & Management Dashboard (piMD) solution provides the tools necessary for "process expert accountability" and meaningful performance improvement success.

Some of the questions posed during the webinar include:

Q: At one point you showed JCAHO criteria for significance of change...8 data points in a row above or below the centerline. But, when you discussed statistical significance on the Inpatient Mortality chart, the pop-up box stated that 3 data points are required to determine statistical significance. Please reconcile.
A: The Joint Commission criteria look for patterns of unusual variation in a process. The rules that we apply to detect this unusual variation are: a point outside the control limits, 8 points in a row above or below the centerline and 6 points in a row increasing or decreasing.
     When we assess the impact of a process change, we are essentially splitting the process into two process: one before the intervention and one after the intervention. We use a couple of statistical tests to determin if there is a statistical difference between the phases. In the case of the Single Value or Multiple Values chart, we use what is called a t-test. We recommend that this statistical procedure require 3 periods for each process (e.g. original and new) to get a good statistical test to determine if the new process is different from the original process. For the percentage or Rate data types, we use a proportions test to determine if the process has changed.

Q: On the control charts, tell us about your control limits—how are they calculated?
A: Statit's SPC charts use the standard algorithms for calculating control limits based on the type of data you are using: percentage, a general rate, multiple values (e.g. LOS for each patient) or single values (e.g. counts). With Statit, you have a choice of specifying the sigma value to be used for the SPC chart. You can explicityly specify a 2 sigma control chart or a 3 sigma control chart. But what we recommend in most situations is to use our control chart that automatically determines the sigman for the control limits based on how many periods of data you are charting. This option greatly simplifies charting a new metric as the system automatically adjusts the sigma value as you collect more data.

Q: The note on the Falls data says "Not yet Validated"...what data is not validated? The current quarter only?
A: For each of the indicators you define, you can decide whether the Process Expert is required to validate new data as it arrives. Validation is necessary whenver a new period of data is detected OR if the data for the most recent two periods on the chart changes.

Q: Many organizations use the term "process owner". Is there a differentiation between process owner and process expert?
A: We believe that these two terms are the same. Within Statit, the Process Expert for an indicator or process is responsible for the overall peformance of the measure and is able to make assessments, action plans, improvement plans and identify process changes for the measures.

Register to View the Presentation Files

Your Name:
E-mail:
Company:
Telephone:
  I would like to receive updates via e-mail.
 

More answers to more questions...

Q: Can more than one person act as a Process Expert for an indicator?
A: Our strong recommendation is that you establish a single Process Expert for each indicator on your system. This clarifies to everyone who is ultimately responsible for the process. In the event that the Process Expert may not be available to act on an indicator, the person who defined the indicator (the Indicator Admin) or any System Administrator may also perform the expert actions. For each expert action, we record the identity of the person who performed the action.

Q: Can we control the use of Assignable Cause at our site?
A: Yes, using Assignable Cause is an advanced capability and you need to make sure that your site establishes guidelines for its use. By default, this capability is disabled on your system and you can enable it when your team of Process Experts is ready to go.

Q:
Why would you allow the Process Expert to change Comments/Actions Plans that occurred in the past?
A: The reason for this is to allow the Process Expert to enter in actions retrospectively (especially when Statit is initially deployed). And we want to allow the Process Expert to clarify or expand on actions performed in the past in case users do not completely understand those actions taken. A concern that you may have is that a Process Expert may go in and change a previous Action Plan. One example would be if an Action Plan developed three quarters ago identified five steps that the Process Expert was going to take to improve on the process, yet they only performed four of the actions. Our system allows the Process Expert to go back and remove the fifth item. But, if the Process Expert does this, any user who had subscribed to that indicator would receive an email stating that the Process Expert has changed the Action Plan from <text before change> to <text after change>. The ultimate in transparency, this is automatically self-policing.